I think the positive effect is very small, but the negative effect is huge. 1. gain a little, and lose most. On the surface, the huge investment in recruiting talents shows that local governments attach importance to education. In fact, it is only one of the political effects pursued by the local government. Such great benefits fall on very few people, enriching individuals and damaging the vast majority of people. Many front-line teachers have worked hard to support the whole local education, but they have not benefited much as a few famous people (besides, whether this title is worthy of the name needs to be questioned). Is this fair and reasonable? 2. Responding to the saying that &”;foreign monks like to recite scriptures&”; seriously dampened the enthusiasm of local excellent teachers. Whether the famous foreign teachers and principals have real ability is not evaluated. There must be outstanding teachers and principals in the local area, so why not increase the reward? More and better training of local famous teachers and principals? In many places, the rewards for local famous teachers are often less than one-tenth that of foreign teachers. This is called how can a famous teacher and principal who has been struggling in the local area for a long time feel? 3. It greatly causes the regional imbalance of high-quality teachers. The places that have the courage to recruit heavily are often economically developed areas, and the regional economy of the candidates is generally not as good as the former. In this way, a vicious circle is created, and the developed areas are more developed in terms of educational talents, while the backward areas are short of talents and even more backward. 4. Seriously distort the initial intention of teachers to become famous. Teachers in all regions wanted to become famous teachers and get a better development platform through their efforts. Nowadays, the ultimate goal of many teachers who want to become famous is to accumulate capital for high bonuses. The local government has worked hard to train a group of famous teachers and eventually make wedding dresses for others. Although some provinces, such as Jiangsu, have stipulated that special-grade teachers must work in the local area for five years, otherwise the special-grade qualification will be abolished, it still cannot curb the trend of people moving upwards. 5. It leads to the nihilism of education. The famous teachers and principals of Southeast Fly are coming for a lot of money. Once a place offers a higher reward than here, do you think they will be tempted to take off again? In reality, such examples abound, because most people who recruit heavily have no real feelings for the local area. The education made by ten famous teachers with a lot of money is ultimately a gorgeous one. To sum up: heavy recruitment is really a gimmick, and the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. To truly reflect the importance of education and teacher growth, we should focus on a large number of unnamed teachers who have worked hard in the front line and create local teachers who love this land.