The same right to rent and sell here should refer to the same right to rent and buy between residents of the same nature, that is, the same right to rent and buy for registered residents and the same right to rent and buy for non-registered residents, such as talent green card holders, without involving the same right for registered and non-registered residents, and the same right for registered and non-registered residents is still unequal. Therefore, the right to rent and sell means to treat the same kind of residents equally, and there will be no order to solve the buyers first and then the renters, but the household registration will still take precedence over the green card for talents or other migrants in Guangzhou. If the household registration is considered as the premise, this should be an inevitable result. After all, a foreign child squeezes out a degree of a household registration child, which will have a great impact both politically and psychologically. In an area, only a few houses that could have been used for admission were sold. Now, all houses have become potential opportunities for admission, so there are more houses that can be used for admission. Suppose a region, corresponding to the top schools. There are 100 houses, and only 5 are for sale. If you want to go to this school, you have to grab five houses. Now with the same right to rent and buy, there are 100 houses that can potentially attend this school. Of the 95 sets, there must be people who don&;t need to study, so they can rent one or pretend to rent one. Obviously, the index of admission is on the threshold of housing, and the scarcity is reduced. Therefore, the school district housing will be reduced in price. Some people think that after renting and purchasing the same right, people who buy the school district house need not sell it as before after their children graduate, so they can rent it, which will push up the rent of the house. The more the rent income, the higher the house price. Therefore, renting and purchasing the same right will only increase the price of the school district house. However, the current housing price has long been decoupled from the rental price, and the rise in housing prices mainly depends on the expectation of future price increases. In addition, the investment of middle-class families in education is actually not high. The so-called high price of school district houses is actually an investment, which can be earned back after being sold. Therefore, buying 5 million school districts does not mean that parents&; budget for children&;s education will be as high as 5 million. Moreover, even if you rent a school district, it must mean that you can go to a good school, and you still need to draw lots. Therefore, the increase in rent is bound to be limited. In addition, even if the rent rises, it will push up the house price from the income, but at the same time, if there is a need for admission, in addition to buying a house, it can also be solved by renting a house, which will inevitably eliminate part of the purchase demand. Less demand will obviously lower house prices. More importantly, lower demand will lower people&;s expectations of future housing price increases in the region, which is the biggest factor affecting housing prices. Therefore, it is self-evident that rent increase and demand decrease are more important to housing prices. In addition, some people think that there will not be as many rented houses with high-quality degrees as expected. Many elderly people have to leave them to their grandchildren to go to school, so they will still have strange goods to live in, and the impact of renting and buying the same rights will be limited. However, in real life, not so many landlords need to enroll. There is a 30-year gap between children&;s graduation from primary school and their grandchildren&;s schooling. At least, there are 20 years in the middle without considering the school district. At the same time, it also means that the right to rent and purchase is mainly solved.It is the distribution of educational resources among residents of the same nature, not between registered and non-registered population. Therefore, after the implementation of the policy of renting and purchasing the same rights, there will be a phenomenon that the registered population who rents a house has higher priority in admission than the non-registered population who buys a house. From the perspective of the household registration system itself, this is self-consistent, but this model also makes those who try to make up the difference between household registration and non-household registration feel desperate through more funds. In addition: many people think that the rent will be very high, 20 thousand a month Is the middle class really willing to invest that much money? There are 5 million school districts, and many people are rushing to buy them because they can still sell and earn money after buying and using them. Not really investing 5 million for school. Invest 20 thousand rent every month. Are people really that rich? Moreover, after renting and purchasing the same rights, more students have to draw lots. Rent-and-purchase with the same rights, with the same rights, at least is the equal lottery of buying a house and renting a house. Since there is a probability here, can the rent really be that high? Others said that there was a similar policy in the past, which could also provide a school in the area for renters, but it was definitely not a good school. However, now that we are talking about the same right, how can we understand this same word? Equal pay for equal work, equal treatment, literally, of course, refers to the same treatment as renting a house. Unless the person who drafted the plan doesn&;t even pass the most basic language. Now the details of the policy have not come out. But don&;t put it aside and try to figure it out. Each district will formulate specific policies, and this policy will still be implemented. The benefits of unbalanced educational resources are all taken up by landlords. Needless to say, the first landlord, the second landlord, spent millions to send his children to school. After the children graduated, they sold them and made some money. In this process, schools and teachers are not good, and officials are not good, but this situation may change after renting and purchasing the same rights. With a one-time investment of 5 million yuan, many families have no money, but many families are still willing to invest more than 20,000 yuan a year. Therefore, renting and purchasing the same rights will increase the competition in the school district, so that most families who can&;t afford or have no intention of buying a school district can enter school through rent. There is a sudden increase in a large number of new students in the school district, who are required to enroll on the basis of lease contracts. The solution to this situation is very mature, that is, everyone draws lots together. Draw lots, and naturally there will be relationships and gifts. As a result, while house prices are falling, school teachers, principals and officials in the education system have more say. Therefore, after the right to rent and purchase, the power of the education department has expanded, and the rent-seeking space has come. The interests of the original landlord have all been transferred to the education system. Then, how to choose is obvious.