It has been almost half a year since the discussion of &”;rent-purchase with right&”;. Mainly from three aspects: 1. Rent-and-purchase equal rights, in essence, weaken the role of the house as a civil rights certificate. For a long time, the civil rights such as pension, medical insurance, education and employment are almost closely related to housing property rights. The only way for residents in other cities or rural areas to settle down and enjoy these civil benefits is to buy a house. The introduction of the policy of &”;equal rights for rent and purchase&”; means that more civil rights such as education and household registration will be given to these tenants, breaking the welfare rigidity behind household registration and unbinding the legality of high-quality resources. However, in terms of high-quality educational resources (just the first-tier cities of Beishangguang, which occupy almost more than 20% of the country&;s high-quality educational resources), it is a scarce resource and is market-oriented. The market has its established rules, and the school district houses bring houses and households. Although renting and purchasing have the same rights, only those with registered residence and housing have priority. Therefore, even if renting and selling have the same rights, it is not equal to the above key schools. 2. Rent &”;empowerment&”; should avoid the result of &”;can&;t afford to buy a house&”; to &”;can&;t afford to rent a house&”;. The problem of how to distribute it fairly under the constraint of scarce resources must be solved, and at the same time, the rights and interests of vested interests such as buyers of high-priced school districts should be taken into account. China&;s housing prices have been rising continuously, largely because of the high-quality resources attached to the house. Taking educational resources as an example, high-priced school districts are equivalent to weakening the rights of low-and middle-income groups in disguise. However, it is precisely because of the scarcity of high-quality educational resources in big cities that &”;equal rights&”; is only a redistribution of existing resources. It is not feasible to realize &”;equal rights in education&”; through &”;equal rights in rent and purchase&”; and unilaterally decouple the qualification of buying a house from admission, which is likely to lead to the skyrocketing rent of school districts, from &”;unable to afford a house&”; to &”;unable to afford a house&”;. 3. Rent-and-purchase should be carried out simultaneously, which requires the real implementation of the rationing of public policies and the further standardization of detailed rules and the construction of supporting resources such as education. Recently, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development stated that it is an important signal to further refine the corresponding policies to gradually clarify the real estate market supply system of &”;rent and purchase simultaneously&”; through legislation. In addition to clarifying the principle of &”;equal right to rent and purchase&”;, it is necessary to increase the supply of rental housing, such as increasing the supply of land for rental housing, allowing &”;business to rent&”;, allowing lessors to rent after renovating houses according to residential design specifications, and also increasing investment in the supply of educational resources. Therefore, to realize &”;rent-and-purchase equal rights&”;, we must at least go over the three mountains of household registration, school district and system.