Village in the city is the place with the worst living environment, the most potential safety hazards and the most complicated public security situation in Guangzhou, and the collective economic model is relatively extensive and inefficient. The relevant person in charge of the Municipal Urban Renewal Bureau said that the environment of the villages in the city that have been renovated has improved significantly, but the progress of the renovation is generally slow. In fact, the transformation of villages in Guangzhou started earlier. Since 1999, Guangzhou has been planning the transformation of villages in the city. After Guangzhou&;s successful bid to host the Asian Games in 2004, the renovation of urban villages was closely combined with the preparations for the Asian Games. The renovation of seven pilot urban villages located in the central city, such as Liede, Xiancun, Yangji, Linhe, Xiaogang, Sanyuanli and Pazhou, was put on the agenda of the &”;Great Change&”; project in Guangzhou, and the renovation was promoted according to the model of &”;one village, one policy, one mature one and one renovation&”;. At present, the comprehensive renovation projects of villages in Liede, Linhe, Pazhou and Yangji have achieved remarkable results. For example, in Liede Village, where the renovation has been completed, the rental income of villagers&; houses has increased by five times, the value of villagers&; own houses has increased by seven times, the annual income of village collectives has increased by five times, and the annual per capita dividend of villagers has increased by six times. The renovation has also guaranteed the construction of Liede Bridge. As of May 2018, the city has approved 43 comprehensive renovation projects of old villages, with a renovation area of 19.52 square kilometers, and the green space rate of the completed old villages has increased from 5% before the renovation to 30%; The building density was reduced from more than 60% to less than 30%, and 1.03 million square meters of illegal buildings were demolished; The average land saving rate is 48%.