The right to rent and sell here should refer to the right to rent and buy between residents of the same nature, that is, the right to rent and buy of registered population, and the right to rent and buy of non-registered residents, such as green card holders of talents, without involving the right to rent and buy of registered population and non-registered population, which is still unequal. Therefore, the same right to rent and sell means that the same kind of residents are treated equally. There will be no order to solve the buyers first, and then the renters, but the household registration will still take precedence over the talent green card or other people outside Guangzhou. If household registration is considered as a prerequisite, this should be an inevitable result. After all, a foreign child who squeezes out a registered child&;s degree will have a great impact both politically and politically. In an area, there are only a few houses that could have been used for admission. Now, all houses have become potential opportunities for admission, so more houses can be used for admission. Suppose a region, corresponding to the top schools. There are 100 houses, only 5 for sale. If you want to go to this school, you have to grab five houses. Now, renting and purchasing the same rights, there are 100 houses that can potentially be read in this school. Of the 95 sets, those who definitely have no reading needs can rent one, or pretend to rent one. Obviously, the index of enrollment is on the front threshold of housing, and the scarcity is reduced. Therefore, the school district housing will be reduced in price. Some people think that after renting and purchasing the same rights, the people who bought the school district housing don&;t have to sell it as before after their children graduate, so they can rent it out, which will push up the rent of the house. The more income from rent, the higher the house price. Therefore, renting and purchasing the same rights will only push up the price of the school district housing. However, the current house price has long been decoupled from the rental price, and the rise of house price mainly depends on the expectation of future price increase. In addition, middle-class families&; investment in education is actually not high. The so-called high price of housing in school districts is actually an investment, which can be earned back after being sold. Therefore, the purchase of 5 million school districts does not mean that parents&; budget for their children&;s education will be as high as 5 million. Moreover, even if you rent a school district, it must mean that you can go to a good school, and you still need to pass the lottery. Therefore, the increase in rent is bound to be limited. In addition, even if the rent goes up, it will push up the house price from the income, but at the same time, if there is an enrollment demand, it can also be solved by renting a house, which will inevitably eliminate part of the purchase demand. Less demand will obviously lower house prices. More importantly, lower demand will lower people&;s expectation of future housing price increase in the region, which is the biggest factor affecting housing prices. Therefore, it is self-evident that rent increases and demand decreases, which is more important to house prices. In addition, there is a view that rental houses with high-quality degrees will not be as much as imagined. Many elderly people have to leave them for their grandchildren to go to school, so there will still be exotic goods to live in, and the impact of renting and purchasing the same rights will be limited. However, in real life, not so many landlords need to go to school. It takes 30 years for a child to graduate from primary school and go to school with his grandson. At least, there are 20 years in the middle without considering the school district. At the same time, it also means that the same right of rent and purchase is mainly solved.It is the distribution of educational resources among residents of the same nature, not between registered and non-registered population. Therefore, after the implementation of the policy of sharing the right to rent and purchase, there will be a phenomenon, that is, the enrollment priority of the registered population who rents a house is higher than that of the non-registered population who buys a house. From the perspective of the household registration system itself, this is self-consistent, but this model also makes those who try to make up for the difference between household registration and non-household registration through more funds feel desperate. In addition: many people think that the rent will be very high, 20,000 a month. Is the middle class really willing to invest so much money? Many people rush to buy 5 million school buildings because they have bought, used, sold and made money. I didn&;t really invest 5 million to go to school. With a monthly rent of 20,000 yuan, are people really that rich? Moreover, after renting and purchasing the same rights, there are more students, and lots have to be drawn. The same right to rent, the same right, at least is the equal lottery between buyers and renters. Since there is a probability here, can the rent really be that high? Others say that there was a similar policy before, which could also provide renters with schools in an area, but it was definitely not a good school. But now, when we talk about equal rights, how do we understand the same word? Equal pay for equal work, equal treatment, literally means the same treatment as renting a house and buying a house. Unless the people who drafted this plan can&;t even pass the basic language. The detailed rules of the policy haven&;t come out yet. But don&;t let it go. Try to figure it out. Each district will formulate specific policies, and this policy will still be implemented. All the benefits of unbalanced educational resources are taken up by landlords. Needless to say, the first landlord and the second landlord spent millions to send their children to school. After the children graduated, they made some money by selling them. In this process, schools and teachers are not good, and officials are not good either. However, after renting and purchasing the same rights, this situation may be changed. With a one-time investment of 5 million yuan, many families have no money, but with an additional investment of 20,000 yuan a year, many families are still willing. Therefore, renting and purchasing the same rights will increase the competition in school districts, so that most families who can&;t afford or have no intention of buying a school district house can curve their enrollment through rent. There is a sudden increase of a large number of new students in the school district, who are required to enter the school by the lease contract. The solution to this situation is mature, that is, draw lots together. Draw lots, there will naturally be relationships and gifts. As a result, while house prices are falling, school teachers, principals, and officials of the education system all have more right to speak. Therefore, after renting and purchasing the same rights, the power of the education department is expanded, and the rent-seeking space comes. The interests of the original landlord have all been transferred to the education system. Then, the choice is obvious.