To talk about the worst love rat, I really met one, that is, Wu, who was originally from Yishui, lived in Qingdao and now lives in Guangzhou. On the evening of August 27th, 2016, the owner xx drove a small off-road car-mounted friend and a group of seven people from Jimo, Qingdao to the Oktoberfest branch of the World Expo in Licang District for a drink, and returned around 22: 00. Because the other six of the seven people all drank, only Wu did not drink, and xx and other six people asked Wu to drive them back. On the way, Wu was distracted by watching mobile navigation, but he didn&;t find the pedestrians in front, Wei xx and Shi xx, and the small off-road vehicle B5A25X came into physical contact with them, causing vehicle damage. Shi xx and Wei xx fell to the ground and were injured. Shi xx died two days later after being rescued by the hospital. It was determined by the traffic police that Wu bears the main responsibility, while Shi xx and Wei xx bear the secondary responsibility. At that time, the visibility was excellent, and pedestrians were scarce. If you drive normally, you can see pedestrians 300 meters away. On October 18th, 2016, relatives of the deceased Shi xx, Wei xx (wife), Shi xx (son), Shi xx (father) and Wang xx (mother), filed a lawsuit with Licang Court. After court mediation ((2016) Lu 0213 Minchu No.3765), the insurance company compensated the four relatives for a total of 820,000 yuan (fulfilled); Wu X compensated 102,000 yuan (after deducting 62,000 yuan already paid, the remaining 40,000 yuan was paid within one year, which has not been fulfilled so far). Survivors with severe disabilities are worse than dead. Qingdao Wanfang Judicial Appraisal Institute issued an appraisal opinion on May 22, 2017. Wei xx was rated as a first-class disability due to spinal cord injury and paraplegia of both lower limbs caused by traffic accidents; The degree of nursing dependence is complete nursing dependence. After investigation by the court, the family life of the victim is extremely difficult. The specific situation is as follows: Wei xx is paraplegic, incontinent, first-degree disabled, and needs high-intensity escort for a long time. He spends at least 60,000 yuan on nursing expenses, living expenses, disability supplies, etc., and most of them rely on the help of relatives and friends and the difficult assistance of the unit trade union. Wei xx&;s father-in-law (living together) is a retired employee of xx Department. A year ago, due to physical discomfort, he was diagnosed with a variety of refractory chronic diseases, and his monthly medical expenses were about 10,000 yuan. Wei xx&;s mother (living together) Zhu XX (born in 1944) and her mother-in-law (living together) Wang XX (born in 1945) are both in their seventies. They suffer from hypertension, stomach disease, sequelae of cerebral infarction and other chronic diseases and need long-term medication. They have no ability to work and no source of income. On June 9, 2017, Li Cang Court sentenced Wu X to one year&;s imprisonment for committing a traffic accident. Wu X refused to accept the judgment of the first instance and appealed. During the second instance, Wu X demanded reconciliation from the applicant in order to reduce the criminal punishment. Wu x pear flower brought rain, promised to make positive compensation, and only paid Wei xx economic loss of 30 thousand yuan, and obtained criminal understanding from the victims and close relatives. The applicant pities his youth, and on the premise that he promises to fully fulfill the compensation awarded by the court in the future, he conditionally reached an understanding agreement on December 23, 2016, in which Article 3 stipulates: &”;Party B.It means that Party A will actively compensate for the losses caused by this traffic accident in the future (subject to the number listed in the court judgment and mediation, and respect the court judgment) &”;; Article 5 stipulates: &”;In view of the fact that the criminal understanding letter issued by Party A is based on the goodwill and understanding that Party B is still young and accepting criminal punishment may have serious adverse effects on his life, and for the sake of fairness, if Party B violates the aforementioned Article 3 and causes new disputes in the future, he will voluntarily pay a penalty of RMB 100,000 only&”;. On July 31, 2017, Qingdao Intermediate People&;s Court changed Wu X&;s conviction of traffic accident according to law, and sentenced him to 10 months in prison and suspended for one year. Court blacklist The court made two judgments to determine the liability for compensation. On November 7, 2017, the first-instance judgment of Licang Court ((2017) Lu 0213 Minchu No.897): xx compensated Wei XX for 1.26 million yuan; Wu x is jointly and severally liable for compensation. On March 2, 2018, the second instance judgment of Qingdao Intermediate People&;s Court ((2018) Lu 02 Min Zhong No.203) xx compensated the appellant Wei XX for 1.34 million yuan, and Wu X was jointly and severally liable for compensation. The legal fees totaled 22,780 yuan, of which 5,918 yuan was borne by Wei xx and 16,862 yuan by xx and Wu X.. After the probation period expires, Wu X will play missing after receiving criminal understanding, and he will not pay a penny. For this reason, the four plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit in Hanting Court. In view of the breach of the above agreement, the Hanting District Court ((2019) Lu 0703 Minchu 389) ruled that Wu Xin paid the plaintiff a penalty of 100,000 yuan and bore the legal costs of 2,300 yuan. After the probation period expired, with the assistance of his relatives, Wu changed his residence several times to avoid court execution. In view of the unfulfilled part (40,000 yuan) of Wu X, the civil mediation document No.3765 of (2016) Lu 0213 at the beginning of the Republic of China, the parties applied for compulsory execution, and Licang Court filed a case on May 15, 2019 ((2019) Lu 0213 Zhi No.760), and this execution was terminated on August 26, 2019 because Wu Xin refused to perform it. Black-hearted Lao Lai refused to negotiate compensation and went missing. (2018) During the enforcement of the judgment of Lu 02 Minzhong No.203, the defendant xx said that he could bear most of the 1.34 million yuan in the judgment of Lu 02 Minzhong No.203 (2018), and pay in installments, and the rest was borne by Wu. After that, xx gradually paid part of the compensation, but Wu X always avoided it and did not pay any compensation. As a result, the implementation of the settlement agreement has been unable to sign. After the mediation and judgment of the above three cases came into effect, Wu Xin failed to perform a penny, the court&;s judicial documents were rejected, and the number and residence were repeatedly changed to resist execution. Wu x, female, Han nationality, was born on November 16th, 1995, and her household registration was in Longjiaquan Township, Yishui County, Shandong Province. Before the incident, she worked in Jimo Haibo&;s home. After the incident, her residence was transferred several times, and her number was changed many times. Now she is in a state of losing contact. It is reported that I later worked in a clothing store in Jimo with a monthly salary of 6,000-7,000 yuan, and I transferred more than 100,000 yuan to my relatives. Now I am wandering around Guangzhou. In 2017, he lived in the west area of Baolong Square, Lan &;ao Road, Jimo District, Qingdao, and moved to No.17 Datong Street, Jimo District to escape execution;After investigation by the court, Wu has a passport to Hong Kong and Macao under his name, and he frequently flies. In 2019 alone, there were: June 18, 2019, Liuting-Beijing (by plane); On June 22, 2019, Beijing-Liuting plane (there was another ticket purchase record for the train from Beijing South to Jimo North on the same day); July 16, 2019, Liuting-Beijing (by plane); 2019, July 18, Beijing South-Qingdao North (train); On March 30, 2019, there was a civil aviation record from Guangzhou to Liuting Airport. The court offered a reward for catching Lao Lai.