This is a lose-lose outcome. The living conditions of nail households have not improved and the design of the bridge is not beautiful, but the two sides are still talking! Guangzhou Haizhu Yong Bridge, with a total length of 400 meters and four lanes in both directions, was officially opened to traffic on August 3, but it was &”;split&”; in the middle of the bridge, and an old house of about 10 square meters refused to move. At present, three generations of family still live here, and the bridge designer also designed an exit for them to travel, but the location of the house was &”;excellent&”;, which was nicknamed &”;Eye of Haizhu Yong&”; by everyone and became the punching place in online celebrity. Nowadays, no matter where demolition is carried out, the asking price is getting higher and higher, especially in big cities. Once demolition is carried out, civilians will be turned into multimillionaires. It is estimated that the residents here also have such plans. The asking price is too high and the expectations are too high, so the compensation for demolition cannot be discussed properly, so the design of the bridge can only be changed. I respect your choice if you don&;t open it. You can&;t demolish each other. Once the old man and the old woman are demolished, things will get worse. However, for the major construction of the city, the relevant departments should also make great efforts to do the work, and they can&;t let the other side talk. What the other side wants is the demolition fee. In fact, there is no difference between the behavior and the behavior. Can administrative measures be taken according to law? For the &”;nail house&”;, if they make some concessions with the construction party on the normal compensation standard, they will accept what they want. As a win-win result, with the subsidy, their housing environment can be improved and their life may change. If you insist on not demolishing the house, the house will remain the same. Even if there is a travel passage for you, the surrounding environment has changed, which can only be more inconvenient. It is reported that the two sides are still negotiating, hoping to have a good result. For the relocated households, there will be no shop after this village. We should seize the opportunity, don&;t importune, and don&;t make excessive behavior. For the construction parties, for the sake of urban development, we still have to find ways to resolve these contradictions, and we can&;t be angry. This is not the style of serving the people!