Wu Ben is not liked because of his rough language and poor appearance, but the more he does, the more authentic and early he is. Wu Bentong&;s works are well connected with the first eighty chapters and take care of the fat batch perfectly, while Cheng Gaoben&;s works are impassable, inconsistent with the first eighty chapters, inconsistent with the fat batch, inconsistent with the original text, and inconsistent with the relationship between Afeng and Daiyu. Wu Ben can&;t be written by modern people, but Cheng Gaoben has many lessons from Wu Ben. It can be seen that Wu Ben was seen in Cheng Gaoying, but Wu Ben was not allowed to be published at that time, which also confirmed that the first draft of Ming adherents was reviewed, added and deleted by Cao Shi and others. As for all kinds of words and excuses of collectors, it is normal. If I were a collector, I might do better than him (her). Collectors are kind. The author speculates that there is no original or the original has been removed, and the published copy is an over-recorded copy (handwritten by the collector) and there are many changes, additions and deletions when the collector publishes it. Again, the collector is kind, at least a lot of content has been published. To say the least, Wu Ben provided a different way of thinking, which was in line with the original intention of the first eighty times and was in line with the criticism. Sinc《石头记》 came out more than 200 years ago, there have been countless books. Which one can be perfectly connected with the original? Only Wu Ben. Therefore, Wu Ben can only be the original work, because only the original author can have such a complete idea and make the article connected. Or take another 10,000 steps. The author of Wu Ben has read the outline of the first edition, which is not much different from the original. Right and wrong, judge by yourself, don&;t follow suit.