First, if the small property right house in Guangzhou is demolished, if it is approved and agreed by the local authorities, then the small property right house can be compensated accordingly, that is, according to the local compensation policy or the cost of building. Secondly, if it has not been approved and agreed by the relevant departments, then the highest building cost can be obtained for the small property right house. If it is serious, it may involve illegal construction, and no one will make up for it. Third, there is no real estate license for small property houses! The chance of competing with the original owner with real estate license is very small! If an agreement is signed before the purchase! It is still acceptable to apply with relevant departments! How to compensate for the demolition of small property houses? Let&;s talk about this issue in the Ming Dynasty. First of all, let&;s be clear: the small property right house is not a legal concept, but a conventional title formed by people in social practice. Small property houses generally refer to houses built on rural collective land, without relevant documents and payment of land transfer fees. Their property certificates are not issued by the state housing management department, but by towns or village committees, also known as &”;township property houses&”;. Small property houses are also different from ordinary commercial houses we usually buy. Strictly speaking, they have no right to transfer or rent, and they are not legal. From this perspective, small property houses may not be 100% directly recognized as illegal construction, but there are indeed serious rights defects. An important factor in the existence of a small property right house is that its price is very cheap. Often, the price of a small property right house in the same lot is half or even lower than that of an ordinary commercial house, and the rent for renting will also be low. So when it faces demolition, how is the small property right house compensated? As we know, the current legal basis for expropriation and compensation of houses built on rural collectiv《土地管理法》: the compensation standards for attachments and young crops on expropriated land shall be stipulated by provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government. That is, houses on rural collective land are attached to young crops, and their compensation standards are stipulated by provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government. In practice, there are mainly two kinds of compensation for demolition and resettlement in various places. One is monetary compensation, and the compensation is determined according to the replacement price of the demolished house and the location compensation price of the homestead. The other is housing placement. Generally, rural collective economic organizations build resettlement houses on collective land. The demolition of small property houses should also be carried out in accordance with the collective land acquisition procedures, including the announcement of land acquisition, consultation with villagers, cadastral survey and registration of attachments on the ground, drawing up four plans, announcement of land acquisition, announcement of land acquisition compensation and resettlement plan, approval of land acquisition compensation and resettlement plan, land compensation registration and implementation of compensation and resettlement plan. However, it should be pointed out that the above analysis is more of a kind of &”;wishful reference map&”;. In practice, if the expropriation and demolition of small property houses are really encountered, such houses may be identified as &”;unregistered illegal buildings&”;, and then they will be compensated without compensation or only with very low &”;moderate&”; compensation such as construction cost. And this compensation is possible.Only for the builder, but not for the subsequent buyers and lessees, because the signed purchase contract and lease contract may be deemed invalid according to law. If so, it is definitely a tragedy for the stakeholders involved in the small property right house. Of course, this ultimately depends on the policy. In Ming Dynasty, lawyers should remind buyers who buy small property houses that because small property houses have huge interests in demolition, most of the original owners will go back on their words and claim that the sales contract is invalid. Once the sales contract is confirmed to be invalid by the court, the benefits of demolition obtained by the purchaser will be greatly reduced. However, the contract between members of the collective organization to buy and sell small property houses is generally considered valid, while the contract between members of the collective organization and non-collective organizations to buy and sell small property houses is generally considered invalid. Because China&;s laws and regulations do not prohibit the sale of houses on the homestead between members of the collective economic organization, as long as the same collective member has the corresponding capacity for civil rights and capacity for civil conduct, when signing the contract for the sale of small property rights, the intention is true and does not violate the law or social public interests, it is generally recognized that the contract for the sale of small property rights is valid. In short, for people who are not members of this collective economic organization, it is better not to touch, buy or rent a small property right house, otherwise, once they encounter various changes, their rights and interests will be difficult to be guaranteed. Before deciding to buy or rent a house, we must carefully review the ownership certificate of the house involved, so as to avoid signing the contract for buying or renting a house or paying the advance payment or deposit hastily when the ownership status is unclear.